5.3. UDM HTTP REST API#
This section describes the technical architecture for the UDM HTTP REST API, a JSON HTTP interface to interact with Univention Directory Manager. It follows a RESTful architecture, adheres to REST principles and provides an OpenAPI schema.
For a general overview about UDM, see UCS management system and Univention Directory Manager (UDM).
For information about how to use the API as a developer, see UDM REST API in Univention Developer Reference [3].
You find the source code for UDM HTTP REST API at UCS source: management/univention-directory-manager-rest/.
Tip
This section uses various concepts of the ArchiMate notation. To avoid confusion, have a close look at the figures and make yourself familiar with the different concepts in the Application layer and the Relationships in the appendix.
Fig. 5.7 shows the relation of UDM HTTP REST API down the line from the UCS Product components with the UCS management system, and its Domain management implemented by Univention Directory Manager (UDM).
The Univention Corporate Server application component has Product components services assigned to it. Product components are an abstract container for the main product building blocks, see Product components. Product components consist of the UCS Management system and other application services. UCS Management System application service consists of the Domain Management application service and others. Univention Directory Manager (UDM) application service serves the application services Domain management and UDM HTTP REST API.
Hint
Fig. 5.7 isn’t a layer diagram, because it uses composition and aggregation relations between the different concepts.
5.3.1. Architecture#
Fig. 5.9 provides an overview of the architecture of UDM HTTP REST API.
The main building blocks are the following concepts:
- UDM HTTP REST API application component
The central part of the UDM HTTP REST API is the application component that contains the respective application services for communication with the outside world, the server, and the gateway.
The package univention-directory-manager-rest provides this application component and all the pieces outlined later.
- UDM HTTP REST API application service
The application service that the UDM HTTP REST API explicitly exposes. It’s an abstraction of the other application processes that realize it.
- Gateway for UDM HTTP REST API application process
UDM HTTP REST API launches one Gateway process. It forwards each request from the Reverse Proxy to the appropriate Server for UDM HTTP REST API process with the required locale.
- Server for UDM HTTP REST API application process
Server for UDM HTTP REST API is a dedicated server process for each configured natural language. It serves the content accordingly.
- Reverse proxy application service
The Reverse proxy functions as gateway. It adds HTTP security headers and forwards HTTP requests to the Gateway for UDM HTTP REST API service. It also handles errors in case the Server for UDM HTTP REST API is unreachable. It’s part of the web server on UCS.
- HTTP JSON interface application interface
UDM HTTP REST API can answer requests in the
HAL+JSON
format.Hypertext Application Language (HAL) provides hypermedia controls to navigate the API efficiently and independently.
- openapi.json
The openapi.json describes the HTTP JSON interface in the OpenAPI schema following the OpenAPI specification. The JSON file allows to auto-generate RPC clients.
5.3.2. Technology#
Fig. 5.9 shows the architecture in a non-nested view with some more concepts around the reverse proxy. It also adds the technology layer with Tornado, Apache HTTP server and Apache module mod_proxy.
Tornado implements the server and the gateway application process for the UDM HTTP REST API. As other services also use Apache HTTP server, so does the UDM HTTP REST API.
You can see in Fig. 5.9, that the UDM HTTP REST API application services is an abstraction for the application processes Gateway for UDM HTTP REST API and Server for UDM HTTP REST API. All three concepts are assigned to the UDM HTTP REST API application component.
5.3.3. Request flow#
Fig. 5.10 shows the abstract flow of a request through the different concepts to the data store in the domain database LDAP directory. The flow emphasizes the dependency of the UDM HTTP REST API to UDM. For more information about the UDM architecture and how UDM Python library relates to it, see UDM architecture.
5.3.4. Capabilities#
UDM HTTP REST API provides capabilities as shown in Fig. 5.11. Different concepts of the UDM HTTP REST API realize different capabilities, so that all of them serve a dedicated purpose.
Hint
A capability in ArchiMate represents an ability that an active structure element possesses.
In the Fig. 5.11, you see different relations such as realization, aggregation, and assignment. Be aware of their different meaning.
- OpenAPI schema
The OpenAPI schema provides the definition of the UDM HTTP REST API in a programming language agnostic manner. It uses the OpenAPI specification and helps to transfer the knowledge about the API from the API provider to the API consumer.
- RESTful architecture
For more information, see RESTful architecture.
- Multi-Language support
The UCS management system supports multiple languages, such as English and German. UDM HTTP REST API belongs to the UCS management system and therefore supports the same set of languages. Language support is important for UDM HTTP REST API to provide localized messages to the client and the user.
See also
- What is OpenAPI?
for more information about OpenAPI and the specification.
5.3.5. RESTful architecture#
The UDM HTTP REST API adheres to the RESTful architecture as defined in Fielding [5]. The term REST stands for Representation State Transfer and includes six architectural and four interface constraints that make a service RESTful.
See also
- UCS source: /management/univention-directory-manager-rest/README.md - “UDM HTTP API”
for a detailed description about the RESTful architecture, the rationale of the constraints, compliance and compliance violations, and the OpenAPI interface.
Architectural constraints#
The six architectural constraints are the following
Client-server
The client-server constraint enforces a clear separation between a passive server component and an active client component. The server component has the authority over the entire service realm and its meaning. The client component must not make any assumptions about the server logic.
The client-server constraint allows clients and servers to evolve independently, because it supports separation of concerns and reduces interdependencies. Clients focus on the user interface and hypermedia. Servers focus on business logic and the representation of resources.
Stateless
The stateless constraint enforces a stateless communication between clients and servers. This means that each request must contain all the information necessary for the server to fully understand and process the request. The client is responsible for handling all session state. This separation allows scalability by adding server instances or processes, since each server can handle requests independently.
Stateless communication simplifies the server implementation and enables service scalability.
Cache
The cache constraint forces data in a response to be either explicitly or implicitly enabled for caching. Caching improves performance by reducing the need for repeated requests to the server.
Uniform interface
The uniform interface constraint requires that components communicate using generic and standardized data formats that all participating components understand. The interface must satisfy the interface constraints described later.
The server must provide the same unified interface that satisfies the data manipulation constraint of all server data. Clients, servers, or other intermediaries can work seamlessly with the API using the same standardized interface. The API doesn’t require application-specific data formats or schemas.
The standardized data format JSON focuses on structure and representation of data. The lacks of mechanisms for semantic and hypermedia interaction make JSON unsuitable as uniform interface.
Layered system
The layered system constraint extends the client-server constraint by introducing intermediate components that have the ability to fully understand and manipulate messages. The intermediate components use the principles of stateless and self-describing messages to extend the architecture. Crucially, each layer operates behind a unified interface that hides layer specifics from clients and components. This layer opacity gives the system a remarkable degree of flexibility and adaptability.
Code-on-demand (optional)
The code-on-demand constraint gives servers the optional ability to extend client functionality by embedding code in representations. This optional constraint comes with the trade-off of potentially limiting availability to clients capable of running the embedded code.
Interface constraints#
The four interface constraints are the following:
Identification of resources
The identification of resources constraint means that the server abstracts all information as a resource. Each resource must have one or more names or identifiers, typically represented by a unique HTTP URI. The server manages the URIs and has the authority to assign them. URIs serve as straightforward identifiers and don’t carry any additional semantic information.
Clients access resources using resource identifiers only. Clients should refrain from manually constructing URIs unless the server provides URI templates. Clients navigate through state transitions using links found within retrieved representations, allowing them to follow hypermedia links and traverse the API without hardcoded URIs. The server can change URIs without disrupting clients.
Manipulation of resources through representations
A resource represents a set of entities that the API reflects through representations or identifies through URIs when a concrete realization of the concept doesn’t yet exist. This fundamental principle implies that the state and representation of a resource can change dynamically over time while remaining the same resource.
It’s important to understand that a representation of a resource isn’t the resource itself. The API represents a resource in various formats, such as HTML, XML, JSON, LDIF representing it’s current state, key-value pairs representing the wanted state, images, or even error conditions such as
404 Not Found
. In REST, the client achieves state changes by examining the response and the ways the response provides to modify the representation. This involves selecting a transformation, creating, or modifying a representation, and sending it back to the server.Self-descriptive messages
The self-descriptive message constraint ensures that the API transmits messages as representations consisting of resource or request data metadata and control data.
The MIME media type of the request data plays a critical role in specifying both the syntax and semantics of message payloads.
Metadata, presented in the form of key-value pairs, describes how to interpret the message, defines caching rules, provides authentication information, specifies encodings, languages of representation, and more.
Control data, a form of metadata, describes metadata, and enables various capability.
Hypermedia as the Engine of Application State
The hypermedia as the engine of application state (HATEOAS) constraint means that representations must not only convey data, but also contain information to control the state of the application. Each response should include all available state transfer capabilities, such as HTML forms, state changes links, URI templates, or other relevant resources.
Hypermedia refers to data formats that can include hyperlinks and other hypermedia elements. Specifications such as JSON-LD, UBER, SIREN, HAL, Collection+JSON, and Hydra extend JSON to include hypermedia elements.
HATEOAS has the following requirements:
The client must know the media type and it must be rich enough to describe all possible client-server interactions.
The client should only follow links contained in the representation, and shouldn’t construct identifiers without user interaction.
5.3.6. Dependencies#
You can resolve the other detailed dependencies with the package manager. UDM HTTP REST API depends on the following elements:
UMC - Univention Management Console for providing the components for the caching of LDAP connections
UDM-UMC module, a dedicated UMC module that provides the common abstraction of UDM modules.
The following server roles need UDM HTTP REST API:
UCS Primary Directory Node
UCS Backup Directory Node